This forum is closed to new posts and
responses. Individual names altered for privacy purposes. The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a forum for customer support requests. Any customer support requests should be directed to the official HCL customer support channels below:
Thanks and I think you are right... ~Umberto Nongeroson 6.Nov.02 09:27 AM a Web browser Notes Client 6.0Windows XP
"In this example, the logo part has a Content-ID, which suggests there was a cid: tag in the HTML for it, but the missing attachment does not." - absolutely correct; there was a cid tag in the HTML for the logo which is why it was rendered correctly
"whether or not the root part(s) contain a cid: for this 'missing' attachment" - they do not and so...
"they get into this grey area of how an unrelated part should be handled by the receiving MUA"
I have attempted to duplicate this by inserting a similarly formatted message with the same attachment directly into the same Domino MTA, using Outlook Express and it comes up with a completely different MIME structure which works (i.e. the attachment is available) - shown below for the morbidly curious.
I am now getting the person who sent the original broken message to send others so that I can see how reproducible the fault is, but the theory about "MUME - Messed Up Mime from Exchange" looks tempting.